Thursday, April 28, 2011

Options for kit holders

So I took pics of a few options that I found at Utrecht...keeping in mind that Utrecht here in Berkeley is quite small...will head to Blick's later to see if there are more interesting options.

This option is more of a portfolio kind of thing with pages inside that can be added and subtracted...

These are the pages inside...

This looks more like a lamination-type thing...

Here's another option for some sort of carrier...


Maybe something like this could be slipped into it?

More options coming soon!

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Book designers grapple with their changing role in a digital world: Observatory: Design Observer

Book designers grapple with their changing role in a digital world: Observatory: Design Observer

Final Publication: A Collection/Catalog

Today we considered what form our group publication could take. We pondered the merits of a printed book versus a digital publication in PDF form, and considered the fact that it can be difficult to decide to do a printed piece once you’ve focused on the digital component, whereas focusing first on the printed piece inherently calls for the creation of a digital document. We also considered the fact that we’ve been working in document sizes beyond the realm of what is likely easy and affordable to print. We considered the possibility of a printed piece with special inserts, or a specially bound piece that would allow large spreads, but came to the same conclusion.

After this brainstorming and consideration of our options, we decided to go in a direction that will both offer a certain degree of flexibility and has the potential to be very visually interesting. This is going to be a hybrid “kit,” a collection/catalog of items/pages—with the single restriction that we use the 8.5x11 dimension. This is a final size—so, for example, you could produce item(s) in an 11x17 size and then fold it down to 8.5x11, or you could produce a larger poster that would fold down to 8.5x11, or you could unite smaller components into an 8.5x11 final size. Our conversation touched on the idea of whether and how we set up some basic rules for the document; for example, how might someone make their way through it? We should also consider the creation and assembly of the document in terms of our systems reading, thinking about how “this” affects “that” and whether there is some basic system to the pages. We discussed the idea of a document allowing some of the free experimentation we executed in our hybrid-picture-matching game—something you could open up and lay out and use to make your own connections. We returned to the idea of how to integrate our three different topics, and discussed how the format of the class is itself a model for the publication, in that we come together each week to unite the strands of conversation and ideas we have been carrying through our own projects individually. We discussed the fact that as we are planning and making our projects, we should think about what would happen if you mixed and matched the items within: crossing chairs—with books—with Taiwan. What happens when you send a chair from the Vitra design collection to Taiwan, then bring it back? Where does Taiwan fit into the history of printed books? How have printed books influenced the design of chairs?

Next up is figuring out how to actually make the project. We should explore different papers and other materials, sizes (still with the goal of arriving at an 8.5x11 package), textures, colors, typefaces, etcetera. We should also determine how the publications (at least four copies) will be packaged, i.e. creating folios for the finished collections. Aside from this literal bringing together of the items, we should consider how all the elements tie together, how we structure moments of separation and moments of integration within the document. For next Tuesday we should come with printouts of EVERYTHING (basically ALL content), so we can lay everything out together and see how this final collection of items will actually work. Following that we will produce!

System images




Taiwan is a multicultural heaven. Alm
ost every foreign product go through a transcends stage to fit the taste of Taiwanese better. I have made some sample images that help to explain this concept. Yet it is very hard to predict the style of any outcome because artists are influence and educated by a mix of different parts of the world. Strivi
ng for difference and unique seems to be the main theme that drives the creative force in Taiwan.

Some Taiwanese are educated from "western" culture by studying abroad; this helps to explain the modern culture of Taiwan.

To further prove this, Taiwan opens her arms and embraces other cultures. In recent years, Taiwan has a new phenomenon where Taiwanese men are in the market to marry women from Vietnam. This has injected another culture spin into the multicultural Formosa. This creates a new fusion between Taiwanese and Vietnamese food.

I will post more pictures and examples to further explain the hybrid culture of Taiwan.

More Catalog/Re-Catalog

This past week I kept moving forward with grouping and re-grouping the Vitra archive of chairs, and started applying outside data to the groupings of chairs. This first chart simply separates the chairs based on the decade the chair was made and whether the presidents occupying the White House were Democrat or Republican.


This time I separated the designers by country of origin to see where the concentrations of creativity and innovation were. Thinking about re-doing this one in a more visual way, that plays with a map perhaps? I tried overlaying the chairs into the bar graph, but it became visually cluttered.

For this chart, I reached into the vast pot of Gapminder data. Though much of it was difficult to decipher and visualize, I decided to start with the data for the GDP growth of countries represented in the chart above that featured more than 2 designers.


Coming soon is a similar chart to the one above, this time tracking the CO2 emissions of the countries featured over the past century. Next steps will be to make visual links between the charts by overlaying/combining/hybridizing in a way that clearly shows the potential present in the act of cataloging and re-cataloging.

Sketches / possible layouts


I've been sketching layouts of what my study of classic books will look like for our publication. I am interested in playing with the catalog format -- continuing to utilize the method of cataloging and recataloging information in order to generate new contrasts -- and displaying those results in a shopping or auction catalog format. I'm currently thinking of something with a bit of humor, like "Shop the History of Print!" This will provide the layout for exploring contrasts between the 100 Best Books of All Time, versus Amazon's Top 100 Free e-Book Downloads (updated every hour), and the Gutenberg Project's Top 100 Books downloaded over the past 30 days. I'm also considering working in tweet-length descriptions of books (perhaps displaying the oldest books on the best-of-all-time spectrum, described in 140 characters or less).

I've expanded my lists of "Bests" and am continuing to do so, while planning possible layouts and juxtapositions of my catalog pages -- contrasting full-length lists; top books by men and by women; the #1 best book on each of the lists I'm reviewing; best books by country around the world, and more. I am interested to see what kind of information these studies will return on what people are reading, how people read, what can be learned by changing reading habits over time as well as topical interests, and what forms will have longevity over time.